0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÁßȯÀÚ½Ç °£È£»çÀÇ 2±³´ë¿Í 3±³´ë±Ù¹« °£ ±Ù¹« ¸¸Á·µµ, ¼ö¸é, ÇÇ·Î, »îÀÇ Áú°ú ȯÀÚ¾ÈÀü»ç°í ºñ±³

Comparison of Shift Satisfaction, Sleep, Fatigue, Quality of Life, and Patient Safety Incidents Between Two-Shift and Three-Shift Intensive Care Unit Nurses

ÁßȯÀÚ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2020³â 13±Ç 2È£ p.1 ~ 11
KMID : 1221920200130020001
ä¹ÎÁø ( Chae Min-Jin ) - Kangbook Samsung Medical Center Department of Nursing

ÃÖ¼öÁ¤ ( Choi Su-Jung ) - Sungkyunkwan University Graduate School of Clinical Nursing Science Department of Nursing

Abstract

Purpose : The aim of this study was to compare shift satisfaction, sleep, fatigue, quality of life (QOL), and patient safety incidents between a newly implemented two-shift system and a traditional three-shift system.

Methods : A total of 127 intensive care unit nurses (48 two-shift nurses and 79 three-shift nurses) working in a tertiary hospital in Seoul were recruited from January 1, 2017, to March 31, 2017. They completed a self-reported questionnaire about their work hours, shift satisfaction, sleep patterns, sleep quality, fatigue, QOL, and patient safety incidents in the past 2 weeks. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0.

Results : The two-shift group showed higher shift satisfaction scores compared with the three-shift group (6.93 vs. 4.37, p£¼.001). Sleep latency was shorter and sleep quality was better in the two-shift group compared with the three-shift group. There were no significant differences in other sleep parameters, fatigue, QOL, and patient safety incidents between the two groups.

Conclusion : Although a two-shift system did not improve nurses¡¯ fatigue or QOL in this study, it may effectively serve as an alternative shift-work system that can increase sleep quality and shift satisfaction without increasing patient safety incidents.
KeyWords
±³´ë±Ù¹«½ºÄÉÁÙ, ¼ö¸é, ÇÇ·Î, »îÀÇ Áú, ȯÀÚ¾ÈÀü
Shift work schedule, Sleep, Fatigue, Quality of life, Patient safety
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)